1961 BMW 700 vs. 2004 Citroen C8
To start off, 2004 Citroen C8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C8 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1961 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C8 weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1961 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C8 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 700 | 2004 Citroen C8 | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 700 | C8 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 47 L |