1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Nissan Crew
To start off, 1996 Nissan Crew is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Crew is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Crew (129 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Crew should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Crew weights approximately 225 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Crew. (175 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Crew.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1996 Nissan Crew | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | Crew |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 175 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |