1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 467 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 85 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 549 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Mustang |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 590 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 728 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |