1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (283 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (441 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2005 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 441 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |