1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1473 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | E-350 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 475 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 132 L |