1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Greyhound | Titan |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 106 L |
