1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 481 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1051 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (999 Nm) has 820 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | SL |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 999 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2066 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4592 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1816 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |