1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1998 Seat Bolero
To start off, 1998 Seat Bolero is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,799 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Seat Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Seat Bolero has automatic transmission and 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 has manual transmission. 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Seat Bolero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1998 Seat Bolero | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Seat |
Model | 2600 | Bolero |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2583 cc | 2799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 350 HP |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 275 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |