1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1262 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 83 L |