1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Ascari Ecosse
To start off, 1999 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ascari Ecosse (395 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 807 kg more than 1999 Ascari Ecosse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 1999 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Ascari Ecosse | |
Make | Cadillac | Ascari |
Model | 62 | Ecosse |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4722 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 678 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 88.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1130 mm |