1962 DAF 600 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Durango (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | 600 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 4702 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |
