1962 Ford Capri vs. 2000 Ford Contour
To start off, 2000 Ford Contour is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Contour (201 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Contour weights approximately 465 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Contour (230 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Capri. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Capri.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Capri | 2000 Ford Contour | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Capri | Contour |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 82.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1418 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 54 L |
