1962 Ford Popular vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Ford Popular is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 10 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Popular | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Popular | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 1810 mm |
