1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2004 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | EK | UTE |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 204 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
