1962 Holden EK vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | 3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |