1962 Lancia Appia vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 665 kg more than 1962 Lancia Appia.
Because 1962 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 1962 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1962 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lancia Appia | 2003 MG ZT | |
| Make | Lancia | MG |
| Model | Appia | ZT |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2760 mm |
