1962 Renault 8 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | 8 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2690 mm |
