1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | SsangYong |
Model | Silver Cloud | Korando |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6223 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |