1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 466 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 2003 Volvo C70 has manual transmission. 2003 Volvo C70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
Model | Silver Cloud | C70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6223 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1981 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |