1962 Steyr 700C vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 843 kg more than 1962 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications: