1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 848 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |