1963 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Ford Freestyle
To start off, 2005 Ford Freestyle is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Freestyle (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 902 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Freestyle (271 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Freestyle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 2005 Ford Freestyle | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Freestyle |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |