1963 AC Cobra vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Cobra weights approximately 280 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Cobra | 102 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2160 mm |
