1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 670 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | AC | Lincoln |
Model | Greyhound | LS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 298 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |