1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |