1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 265 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (128 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | AC | Fiat |
Model | Greyhound | Bravo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 128 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |