1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (129 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1607 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 4162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 95 L |