1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Austin-Healey |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Tickford |
Year Released | 1963 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2600 mm |