1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2001 Rover 75

To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 600 kg more than 2001 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications: