1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 550 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Sixty | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2845 mm |