1963 DKW Munga vs. 1959 Ford 17M
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 17M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford 17M (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford 17M should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford 17M weights approximately 5 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 17M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1959 Ford 17M | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | 17M |
Year Released | 1963 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |