1963 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 335 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Econovan |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2210 mm |