1963 Fiat 1600 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 381 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 1600. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 775 kg more than 1963 Fiat 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 729 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat 1600. (114 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat 1600 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | 1600 | XKA |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2590 mm |