1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Taunus | A6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2833 mm |