1963 Holden EJ vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 522 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Holden | Talbot |
| Model | EJ | Baby |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3130 mm |
