1963 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellel (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 204 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Bellel | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | Bellel | Minx |
Year Released | 1963 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |