1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 18 kg more than 1963 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lincoln Continental | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Lincoln | Dodge |
| Model | Continental | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 2418 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5817 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2017 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3569 mm |
