1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2005 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 300 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2005 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Pontiac | Renault |
| Model | Tempest | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3524 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2750 mm |
