1963 Rover 2000 vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 263 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rover 2000 | 2001 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Rover | Rover |
| Model | 2000 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
