1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | Fronte | 260 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 2383 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
