1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,309 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (343 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Fronte | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3309 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
