1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 957 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Fronte | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |