1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 2012 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Abarth | Opel |
| Model | 1000 GT | Combo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2720 mm |
