1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Abarth | Fiat |
| Model | 2000 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |
