1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 380 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |