1964 Alpine A vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (202 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 1474 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Alpine | Mercury |
Model | A | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2049 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 85 L |