1964 Alpine A vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (231 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Alpine | Land Rover |
Model | A | LR2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 231 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |