1964 Alpine A vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3010 mm |