1964 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon (84 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40.
Because 1964 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | A 40 | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 84 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2390 mm |