1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1989 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1989 Chrysler ES is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 427 kg more than 1989 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 1989 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 90 | ES |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |